Editorial Staff
Editorial Staff346d ago

LA Times’ big financial, subscriber losses in 2024 coincided with conservative shift

LA Times’ big financial, subscriber losses in 2024 coincided with conservative shiftLA Times’ big financial, subscriber losses in 2024 coincided with conservative shift
via Tucker Carlson / YouTube
The Los Angeles Times reportedly lost approximately $50 million in 2024 under owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, following a roughly $30 million loss in 2023.
How it happened
The paper’s financial struggles coincided with several contentious decisions that moved the paper politically rightward, including the addition of conservative writers and Soon-Shiong’s move to revoke the paper’s presidential endorsement of Kamala Harris in October. The latter decision reportedly triggered the loss of some 23,000 digital subscribers by January.
According to internal metrics reported by AdWeek, total subscribers had fallen to about 335,000 by early 2025, far below the publisher’s goal of 5 million readers. The Pacific Palisades fires further damaged revenues by destroying homes in wealthy neighborhoods with high concentrations of valuable print subscribers.
What Soon-Shiong is saying
Soon-Shiong, who has reportedly become more hands-on with the paper’s operations, previously defended his editorial decisions. In a March podcast interview with far-right host Tucker Carlson, the 72-year-old billionaire surgeon and inventor defended his decision to pull the Times’ endorsement of Harris. “I said, ‘This is unacceptable.’ And as you can see, because it’s a left lean, they wrote terrible stories about President [Donald] Trump,” he said. “So my statement to them was, ‘You may have an opinion, but all of us should have opinions based on facts.’”
Soon-Shiong admitted to Carlson, “We lost a lot of viewers. Thousands of people unsubscribed. But I don’t think it’s right that we should be this canceling society.”
In an earlier letter to readers, Soon-Shiong announced new digital initiatives including AI-generated “Insights” features to offer “a wide range of different AI-enabled perspectives” and “Voices” labeling to distinguish opinion content from news reporting. He also stressed the publication’s mission statement, which said, “We strive to take into account different perspectives, particularly if they don’t align with our own, to inform our views.”
 
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we’re building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.

Discussion

Ari C.
Ari C.2h ago

If this happened on campus, Stanford should issue a clear public update and specific safety actions.

212 Face
Mina Z.
Mina Z.1h ago

Agree. People need facts and process, not silence. The school should confirm what is being investigated.

88 Face
Ken L.
Ken L.48m ago

Also important to separate verified details from rumors so this does not spiral online.

61 Face
Linh P.
Linh P.1h ago

The death threat part is extremely serious. Hoping law enforcement and campus security are already involved.

144 Face
Jae T.
Jae T.35m ago

This is where official reporting and support channels need to be visible and easy to access.

42 Face
Sophie W.
Sophie W.56m ago

Can NextShark keep a timeline thread here as updates come in? That would help keep context in one place.

97 Face
Your leading
Asian American
news source
NextShark.com
© 2024 NextShark, Inc. All rights reserved.