Latest Newsletter🍵 Chinese History Month in WARead


Skin Whitening Brand Tells Dark-Skin Filipinos to Fight Discrimination by Becoming Whiter

    Asian America Daily - in under 5 minutes

    Get our collection of Asian America's most essential stories, to your inbox daily, for free!

    Unsure? Check out our Newsletter Archive

    A skin whitening brand received universal backlash from the public after telling women in the Philippines with dark skin to fight discrimination by using their products.

    Glutamax, which sells a variety of products that whiten the skin, released its ill-conceived promotional campaign on Saturday that many have found to be very offensive.

    View this post on Instagram

    A post shared by Freddie Dispo (@freddiedispo) on

    Glutamax’ “Your Fair Advantage” campaign ad is a more insulting play on the common marketing message of similar products in the Philippines which suggest that women with whiter skin are considered to be more attractive.

    First, the ad highlighted the supposed unfair treatment a person with darker skin receives with the phrase “Just because she has whiter skin, she was given a bus seat.”

    Next, it cited an obscure survey that claimed: “3 out 5 Filipinos believe that people with fairer skin receive better treatment than others.”

    The ad then urges its audience to not get angry with such unfair treatment, and instead use GlutaMax.

    View this post on Instagram

    As a dermatologist, I strongly denounce this kind of advertising that promotes whiter skin as being more beautiful and generally more successful in life. Dermatologists promote clear, healthy skin through lifestyle and proper skin care. Whether you have white skin or dark skin, we would always advocate for a regimen that keeps you safe and protected but also show off natural, radiant skin. Let me be clear: there is nothing wrong with being naturally morena. However, some people opt to lighten their skin through whitening products to give their self-esteem a boost and although I don’t agree to it, that is their choice, but they should be educated about the risks of using these products. I’m just concerned with these kind of advertising that touches on women’s insecurities just to sell their products and might make women more desperate to try dangerous regimens that may end up damaging their skin. I’m glad that #Glutamax has acknowledged the shortcomings of their ad campaign. However, I wish there are more advertisements that show there is nothing wrong with natural features and not have to resort to whitening to feel more beautiful. . . . #skinwhitening #dermatology #dermatologist #dermatologiststory #dermatologyskincare #skinbleaching #pdsdermauthority #pdsdermatologist

    A post shared by Joyce Dancel (@joycedancel) on

    Its blatant promotion of colorism irked many netizens, generating thousands of angry comments on multiple social media platforms.

    Many called out Glutamax for actively perpetuating a culture of discrimination, inequality, and shaming on the basis of skin color.

    Following the backlash, some of the ads have since been removed from the brand’s social media accounts and have been replaced with a couple of official statements.

    The first statement, which doubles down on the notion that using whitening products to subject oneself to colonial beauty standards is somehow empowering for women, only shows how the brand has completely missed the point of their critics.

    When the statement received criticisms of its own, the brand then posted another statement with an apology included.

    Meanwhile, the Ad Standards Council of the Philippines (ASC), which screens and regulates advertising materials across all media, released a statement on Monday that the controversial ads were not approved.

    “ASC stands for responsible communications and abides by a strict code of ethics,” the statement read.

    “In connection with the recent GLUTAMAX skin care digital and outdoor ads, the materials posted and displayed were not approved by ASC.

    “GlutaMAX’s advertisment violated ASC’s code of ethics, specifically Article IV Section 1 Item A:

    Article IV Section 1 Item A. of the ASC Code of Ethics on DISPARAGEMENT states that: “Advertisements shall not directly or indirectly disparage, ridicule, criticize, or attack any natural or juridical person, groups of persons, or any sector of society, especially on the basis of gender, social or economic class, religion, ethnicity, race, or nationality.

    “The posting of a disapproved material is in violation of the ASC Manual of Procedures. The matter will be dealt with in accordance with the rules and regulations as stated in said Manual,” it added.

    Featured image via Instagram/myglutamax

    Support our Journalism with a Contribution

    Many people might not know this, but despite our large and loyal following which we are immensely grateful for, NextShark is still a small bootstrapped startup that runs on no outside funding or loans.

    Everything you see today is built on the backs of warriors who have sacrificed opportunities to help give Asians all over the world a bigger voice.

    However, we still face many trials and tribulations in our industry, from figuring out the most sustainable business model for independent media companies to facing the current COVID-19 pandemic decimating advertising revenues across the board.

    We hope you consider making a contribution so we can continue to provide you with quality content that informs, educates and inspires the Asian community. Even a $1 contribution goes a long way.  Thank you for everyone's support. We love you all and can't appreciate you guys enough.

    Support NextShark

    Mastercard, Visa, Amex, Discover, Paypal