Latest Newsletter🍵 AAPIs want justice for Tyre NicholsRead


Singaporean Men Jailed for 1 Year for Wearing Women’s Clothes in UAE

    Asian America Daily - in under 5 minutes

    Get our collection of Asian America's most essential stories, to your inbox daily, for free!

    Unsure? Check out our Newsletter Archive

    A pair of Singaporean men must each serve a year behind bars for wearing women’s clothes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a local court judged.

    Freelance fashion photographer Muhammad Fadli Bin Abdul Rahman, 26, arrived to work in Abu Dhabi on August 8 accompanied by a friend, Nur Qistina Fitriah Ibrahim, 37, who goes by the nickname “Fifi.”

    The pair was arrested on August 9 for wearing female clothing while dining at the food court of a shopping mall and behaving “indecently.”

    For context, cross-dressing and homosexuality are considered crimes in the UAE.

    Fifi, who identifies as transgender, was able to change his name legally but remains “male” in official documents. His 34-year-old sister, who spoke to The Straits Times as “Madam Rozy,” said:

    “Fifi has not undergone gender reassignment surgery, so her personal documents still state her gender as male. We are a very close-knit family and are very worried for her.”

    Singaporean law states that the legal sex cannot be changed without undergoing a “sex re-assignment procedure” as noted under its Women’s Charter.

    According to her sister, Fifi had traveled to the UAE four times in the past but came home without issue.

    “We have a family WhatsApp group and Fifi often sends us messages whenever she’s away. This time, she suddenly went silent and this was out of character. A few days later, we received a voice message from her saying she had been arrested. I was shocked,” she said.

    Meanwhile, Fadli’s 32-year-old brother, Muhammad Saiful Bahri Bin Abdul Rahman, said that his brother was wearing a “normal white shirt” at the time of the arrest.

    He added that the two friends were not represented by a lawyer in the Abu Dhabi court, “My brother was not present in court, and nobody from the Singapore embassy was there either, so he could not have defended himself.”

    According to the Straits Times, officers from Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs were present in court for hearing.

    The hearing, however, did not take place as the judge already decided the sentence sans such hearing and the suspects’ presence. The country’s legal system permits this action.

    The pair, however, can file an appeal on September 4, 15 days after the reading of the sentence.

    For now, their families are understood to be working for legal assistance.

    Support our Journalism with a Contribution

    Many people might not know this, but despite our large and loyal following which we are immensely grateful for, NextShark is still a small bootstrapped startup that runs on no outside funding or loans.

    Everything you see today is built on the backs of warriors who have sacrificed opportunities to help give Asians all over the world a bigger voice.

    However, we still face many trials and tribulations in our industry, from figuring out the most sustainable business model for independent media companies to facing the current COVID-19 pandemic decimating advertising revenues across the board.

    We hope you consider making a contribution so we can continue to provide you with quality content that informs, educates and inspires the Asian community. Even a $1 contribution goes a long way.  Thank you for everyone's support. We love you all and can't appreciate you guys enough.

    Support NextShark

    Mastercard, Visa, Amex, Discover, Paypal