- Legislature passed the bill on August 31, which marks the last day of the legislative session.
- In passing AB331, a Senate committee voted 33 to 4 without much discussion, according to EdSource.
- Sen. Andreas Borgeas (R-Fresno), who supported the ethnic studies and voted for the bill, raised the question of whether the legislature should mandate additional graduation requirements for those who might consider vocational studies.
- Completing an ethnic studies course would satisfy one of the English or social studies course requirements for graduation.
- Student groups GENup, Diversify Our Narrative, and March for Our Lives California, created a petition to rally support for the bill.
- The petition states: “Our education system owes it to us to equip us with the tools to adequately navigate these systems, yet our history courses largely focus on the highlights of European and American history, disregarding the negative impacts of the European experience and misinforming us on how the U.S. government harmed and discriminated against marginalized groups.”
- The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) California believes it is “essential for students to learn about the origins of various ethnic groups and our transnational linkages.”
- The curriculum will reportedly study history, culture, politics, contributions and prejudices.
- On August 17, Newsom signed another bill requiring ethnic studies for California State University graduates into law.
A daily dose of Asian America's essential stories, in under 5 minutes.
Get our collection of Asian America's most essential stories to your inbox daily for free.
Unsure? Check out our Newsletter Archive.
- Medina’s amendment pushes the start date for the inclusion of ethnic studies to the 2029-30 year, instead of the original plan offering the course in the 2025-26 year.
- This should give schools and districts “plenty of time to prepare for a smooth implementation,” such as giving the state more time to provide funding for the new courses, according to the assemblyman.
- Another amendment was pushed to give the governing board of a school district or charter school authority to adopt a “locally developed” ethnic studies course instead of a statewide model ethnic studies curriculum that is being developed.
- The proposal essentially gives power to some districts to adopt a course that may deviate attention from the model curriculum’s focus on the four minority groups traditionally covered by ethnic studies courses: African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans and Native Americans.