Latest Newsletter🍵 Chinese History Month in WARead


The Man Responsible For ‘Birthright Citizenship’ is Chinese American

    Asian America Daily - in under 5 minutes

    Get our collection of Asian America's most essential stories, to your inbox daily, for free!

    Unsure? Check out our Newsletter Archive

    Wong Kim Ark is not a household name; at some point, the man’s descendants barely knew him, too. Yet his story is one that needs retelling in these relevant times of uncertainty, when becoming “American” seems more complicated than ever.

    That’s because Wong, the son of Chinese immigrants, won a case against the United States which reiterated that everyone born in the country, regardless of their race or color, is an American citizen.

    Wong Kim Ark

    Wong was born in San Francisco, California, in 1873. Unfortunately, this was the “exclusion era,” when racism against the Chinese became rampant as white working men looked for scapegoats in the beginning of the Long Depression (Panic of 1873).

    By 1882, Congress enacted the Chinese Exclusion Act, which stopped Chinese immigration and prevented them from becoming U.S. citizens. At this point, Wong’s family returned to China. He was nine years old.

    Years later, Wong, dissatisfied at work prospects, decided to return to the US. He made it back to California without issue in 1890 and found work as a cook in the Sierra Mountains.

    But these were difficult times for Wong and other Chinese born in America, as they had to deal with the ongoing Exclusion Act and the anti-Chinese sentiment that it rendered. They were citizens, yet they were disposable.

    Wong Kim Ark
    Departure Statement of Wong Kim Ark, November 5, 1894

    Then came the fall of 1895, when Wong, who just traveled from China, was denied entry to the United States, despite having all pertinent documents in check. That moment when John Wise, a “collector of customs,” refused to admit him led to the unfamiliar case of The United States v. Wong Kim Ark, argued two years later.

    The Washington Post noted some part of their conversation:

    Wise: “Okay, how old are you?”

    Wong: “24 years old.”

    Wise: “Have you ever been to China before this time?”

    Wong: “Yes. Once before.”

    Wise: “What are you?”

    Wong: “Cook.”

    Wise: “Where were you born?”

    Wong: “Sacramento Street. My father kept a store: 751 Sacramento Street. I was born upstairs, third floor.”

    Wise: “Do you know any White men in San Francisco that know you were born here?”

    Wong: “Yes. Mr. Selenger. He knew me when I was little before I went to the country. Before I was ten.”

    Wong Kim Ark
    Sworn Statement of Witnesses verifying the Departure Statement of Wong Kim Ark, November 5, 1894

    As per court documents, Wong was prevented to land “upon the sole ground that he was not a citizen of the United States.”

    Nonetheless, the cook fought. Two months into his detention, a writ of habeas corpus was filed on his behalf, and his case rose from a district court in Northern California to the Supreme Court.

    Wong Kim Ark
    Discharge of a San Francisco judge in the matter of Wong Kim Ark, January 3, 1896

    On a just day in March 1898, the case was decided in favor of Wong. As a person born on American soil, the Exclusion Act simply did not apply to him — and that he, without a doubt, was American.

    The Supreme Court cited the 14th Amendment:

    “The question presented by the record is whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution,

    ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.’”

    Wong Kim Ark

    No one really knows what Wong did after winning the case, but it’s understood that he went on with his life. He reportedly returned to China, never to set foot again in America. Nonetheless, his landmark case proved to be of important historical reference — and certainly worth a visit at this moment.

    Wong Kim Ark
    A short news story from the Washington Post, March 29, 1898

    As California’s Mike Eng (D-49) put for the San Gabriel Valley Tribune (via 89.3 KPCC):

    “That is because the vast majority of Asian Americans would not be U.S. citizens today save for the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed that the birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment applied even to U.S.-born children of Chinese and other foreign nationals who were legally barred from naturalizing.”

    Support our Journalism with a Contribution

    Many people might not know this, but despite our large and loyal following which we are immensely grateful for, NextShark is still a small bootstrapped startup that runs on no outside funding or loans.

    Everything you see today is built on the backs of warriors who have sacrificed opportunities to help give Asians all over the world a bigger voice.

    However, we still face many trials and tribulations in our industry, from figuring out the most sustainable business model for independent media companies to facing the current COVID-19 pandemic decimating advertising revenues across the board.

    We hope you consider making a contribution so we can continue to provide you with quality content that informs, educates and inspires the Asian community. Even a $1 contribution goes a long way.  Thank you for everyone's support. We love you all and can't appreciate you guys enough.

    Support NextShark

    Mastercard, Visa, Amex, Discover, Paypal