Editorial Staff
Editorial Staff3676d ago

Man Misses Out on $1.1 Billion After Rejecting a $250,000 Investment Offer From Uber

“Wistful, not acute” is how one venture capitalist describes the pain of missing out on a return of more than $1.1 billion after passing on a $250,000 early stage investment in Uber.
In a post last month for Entrepreneur, VC and entrepreneurship professor John Greathouse explained how he passed on investing in Uber during not only its seed round but also its A Round as well.
“I never even bothered to listen to [Uber co-founder Travis Kalanick’s] pitch, even though I was repeatedly offered the opportunity,” he wrote.
If Greathouse, who serves as a managing director for Rincon Venture Partners, had had his firm invest in the ridesharing company then, their investment would have multiplied 4,000 times in value, turning a $250,000 investment into one worth more than $1.1 billion.
In the summer of 2010, Greathouse could have been one of Kalanick’s first-ever pitches because they shared a mutual friend who informed him that Uber was raising a seed funding round. He didn’t bite.
“It might work in San Francisco, Boulder and Austin, but I don’t see it expanding beyond a few small cities with strong tech communities,” Greathouse recalled telling his friend, who is now a senior executive at Uber. “If they try to move into Philly, New York or Boston, they’re going to get their throats slashed.”
A few months later, the friend, who did not work for Uber at the time, pitched the fledgeling ridesharing company again and praised it for “turning the downtime of town car/limo services into cab service” in an unrelated email.
Greathouse replied with what he writes was a “characteristically brilliant” response. His email read:
“Looks like they are ultimately providing the service (via independent drivers), correct? If so, not a great fit. If they are selling s/w that allows independent drivers to make more money, that is a bus model that fits within our overall investment thesis (i.e., s/w sales vs real-world fulfillment of a service).”
In hindsight, Greathouse says he underestimated Uber’s ability to create a two-sided market and its “wily use of consumers to muscle its way into hostile markets.”
The missed opportunity has resulted in Greathouse and Rincon partner Jim Andelman being reminded of Uber’s success every time they connect with that mutual friend.
“The ultimate lesson I learned from scoffing at Uber is that I should have honored my friend’s thoughtful (and repeated) suggestions and his nose for great businesses,” Greathouse wrote.
He added: “Note to my loving wife: The next time a friend knocks me over the head with a billion dollar opportunity, I’m going to listen. Promise.”

Discussion

Ari C.
Ari C.2h ago

If this happened on campus, Stanford should issue a clear public update and specific safety actions.

212 Face
Mina Z.
Mina Z.1h ago

Agree. People need facts and process, not silence. The school should confirm what is being investigated.

88 Face
Ken L.
Ken L.48m ago

Also important to separate verified details from rumors so this does not spiral online.

61 Face
Linh P.
Linh P.1h ago

The death threat part is extremely serious. Hoping law enforcement and campus security are already involved.

144 Face
Jae T.
Jae T.35m ago

This is where official reporting and support channels need to be visible and easy to access.

42 Face
Sophie W.
Sophie W.56m ago

Can NextShark keep a timeline thread here as updates come in? That would help keep context in one place.

97 Face
Your leading
Asian American
news source
NextShark.com
© 2024 NextShark, Inc. All rights reserved.