Hong Kong lawmakers reject own government’s same-sex partnership bill

Hong Kong legislators delivered an unprecedented rejection of their own government last Wednesday, voting down a bill that would have extended limited recognition to same-sex couples who married abroad — a setback for the territory once considered a regional leader on civil liberties.

Unprecedented opposition: A total of 71 lawmakers opposed, 14 supported and one abstained to vote on the Registration of Same-sex Partnerships Bill, which would have granted overseas-married same-sex couples basic protections such as hospital visitation rights and authority to make medical decisions for partners. Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal mandated the legal framework in September 2023, giving authorities a two-year timeline that expires Oct. 27. Public consultation reportedly drew nearly 10,800 responses, with approximately 80% opposing the measure. However, advocacy groups highlighted that half the opposition relied on identical form letters, indicating coordinated campaigns rather than organic sentiment.

What lawmakers are saying: Critics framed the bill as an assault on traditional marriage. Legislator Maggie Chan, for one, displayed a protest sign during proceedings and argued the measure would undermine Hong Kong’s heterosexual marriage foundation. Junius Ho, another lawmaker, questioned why authorities would pursue what he termed “unorthodox” policies that generate “imaginary troubles.”

Supporters, on the other hand, countered with practical arguments. New People’s Party leader Regina Ip highlighted everyday hardships faced by same-sex partners, particularly hospital restrictions that prevent long-term couples from visiting sick partners or participating in end-of-life decisions. Executive Council member Tony Tse linked bill approval to upholding judicial authority and protecting human rights principles.

Community reactions: The vote prompted swift condemnation from rights organizations. Hong Kong Marriage Equality characterized the decision as “disappointing” and warned that it signals disregard for judicial rulings while diminishing individual dignity. Meanwhile, Amnesty International described the rejection as reflecting an “alarming disdain” toward LGBTI communities. Court case initiator Jimmy Sham acknowledged the community’s disappointment but maintained optimism, saying, “All of our community feel very disappointed, but I still want everybody to have hope because this is not the endgame.”

With the October deadline looming, government officials must now find alternative compliance methods. Constitutional Affairs Secretary Erick Tsang has announced plans to collaborate with justice department lawyers rather than seek court extensions.