NextSharkNextShark.com

Harvard asserts notifying insurer about high-profile Asian discrimination lawsuit unnecessary

Harvard asserts notifying insurer about high-profile Asian discrimination lawsuit unnecessary

Lawyers representing Harvard asserted that they did not have to notify Zurich American Insurance Co about the affirmative action lawsuit.

September 21, 2022
SHARE
Lawyers representing Harvard University asserted that the institution did not have to notify Zurich American Insurance Co about the high-profile affirmative action lawsuit the school faced since the insurer “surely knew about” it.
In November 2014, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a lawsuit against the university alleging that its undergraduate admissions practices discriminated against Asian Americans. The case, which was widely covered by mainstream media, resulted in the insurance dispute.
On Monday, Harvard’s lawyers said in a federal court filing that the prominence of the case made it unnecessary to notify the insurance company. 
“The notice requirement is not an escape hatch for insurance companies to avoid liability to policyholders due to technical noncompliance,” Harvard’s lead lawyer Marshall Gilinsky of Anderson Kill told the Boston District Court. 
Subscribe to
NextShark's Newsletter

A daily dose of Asian America's essential stories, in under 5 minutes.

Get our collection of Asian America's most essential stories to your inbox daily for free.

Unsure? Check out our Newsletter Archive.

Last year, Harvard filed a lawsuit against Zurich, demanding that as its secondary insurer it should cover $15 million as part of the expenses it spent defending its admissions practices.
The school has reportedly spent over $25 million for its legal defense, consuming the entirety of its Educational Institution Risk Protector insurance policy from AIG’s National Union Fire Insurance, its primary insurer.
Last month, Zurich filed a pretrial motion for judgment in which it claimed the excess policy covered only claims that were both “made and reported” between November 2014 and January 2016. While SFFA’s 2014 lawsuit was a “claim made” against Harvard, Zurich countered that the school took too long to notify them about the claim.
Harvard responded by pointing out that actual notice trumps the policy’s deadline for making claims in such a case.
While the school admitted to notifying Zurich in May 2017, it asserted that the insurance company must have already known of SFFA’s lawsuit before January 2016, thus satisfying the notice requirement.
Harvard has also filed a motion to order Zurich to turn over underwriting files and other documents as proof that it had prior knowledge of the lawsuit. Zurich has opposed said motion.
 
Featured Image via Hafu Go
MOST READ
    HAPPENING NOW
      Ryan General

      Ryan General is a Senior Reporter for NextShark

      SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

      RELATED STORIES FROM NEXTSHARK

      Support
      NextShark's
      Journalism

      Many people might not know this, but NextShark is a small media startup that runs on no outside funding or loans, and with no paywalls or subscription fees, we rely on help from our community and readers like you.

      Everything you see today is built by Asians, for Asians to help amplify our voices globally and support each other. However, we still face many difficulties in our industry because of our commitment to accessible and informational Asian news coverage.

      We hope you consider making a contribution to NextShark so we can continue to provide you quality journalism that informs, educates, and inspires the Asian community. Even a $1 contribution goes a long way. Thank you for supporting NextShark and our community.

      © 2023 NextShark, Inc. All rights reserved.